First impressions of the Fitbit Force

Fitbit Force

I have a new gadget: the Fitbit Force.

Force is the newest addition to the Fitbit range of activity trackers, which aim to ‘nudge’ sedentary people to move more. It’s a pedometer, essentially, recording the number of steps walked or run, distance covered, calories burned, etc, with a small push-button display. The Force combines the functionality of the Fitbit One (with its screen display) with the sleeker look of the Fitbit Flex wristband. Read more about the Fitbit Force here.

Like a lot of women I rarely wear anything with pockets, so if I’m going to carry something around with me all the time, it really needs to go on my wrist (at least until the Google Glass becomes less douchebag-gy).

The relative puny functionality of the Flex had put me off buying one, but when I heard the more feature-rich Force had been launched I was keen to get my hands on one. It’s only available in the US at the moment, but it’s due for UK and international release in January 2014.

I love a gadget, and I especially like this kind of gadget as I like to measure and track things, but I’m not very good at remembering to do it. The beauty of the Fitbit and its ilk is you don’t really need to record anything – it does it for you.

For the past nine months I’ve been using the Pebble smartwatch, which can run native apps, but works primarily as an additional screen and controller for a smartphone. I find it a bit too chunky for general use, but it’s a brilliant device for runners – it allows me to skip tracks and keep an eye on my Runkeeper distance and pace via the watch, which means I can keep my phone in my pocket rather than on an arm strap, making for a more comfortable run.

Both the Pebble and the Force also tell the time. So if I want to know the time, I can look at my wrist, rather than getting my phone out. Revolutionary, right? I’m not sure it’ll catch on.

Early impressions

My early impressions of the Fitbit are good; it’s comfortable to wear, reasonably attractive, and the battery life is solid. It’s already making a difference to my activity levels; in my first three full days of usage I’ve found myself going out of my way to walk to places to bump up my ‘steps’ total.

The device works in conjunction with a smartphone app, which has a really clean, intuitive user interface. It also uses gamification techniques, awarding badges for achieving total or daily distance goals, and allows you to compete with friends. This feature brings out my worst competitive instincts; the three friends I run Intranetizen with are Fitbit users, and I’m determined to make my way up the league table.

Here’s my Fitbit profile – if you’re a Fitbit user, do add me. The more competition, the better.

But while the Fitbit seems effective at nudging users to be more active day to day, how useful is it for marathon training? I’m not sure. Number of steps isn’t a particularly useful training metric, and building two-mile walks into my working day is unlikely to prove a useful marathon training tactic.

Nonetheless, I like it. I’m about to head off on holiday, so there will be no running until mid-December. In the meantime, I’ll be using the Fitbit to track my holiday walks in Argentina – to make me feel less guilty about all the steak I’ll be eating.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *